When were you going to share this with your readers?http://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2012/07/oops-obamas-top-bundler-jonathan-lavine-was-in-charge-of-bain-during-gst-steel-layoffs/
I don't understand the point of this story. What is wrong with a campaign receiving contributions from someone associated with Bain? Are you suggesting that the president is responsible for or approves of everything that every single one of his contributors does? And wouldn't you want the president or his campaign to feel free to criticize a company even if they took contributions from one of their executives? In fact, if they went soft on Bain after accepting money from some of their executives, then people would probably accuse them of corruption. How is this the same as Romney disavowing responsibility for the actions of the company that he was the CEO of?